Running a Healthcare Claims Platform Locally in Kubernetes, Part 5: From Faster to Repeatably Faster
How the local Kubernetes sweep harness turned isolated fast runs into repeatable performance evidence.
How the benchmark moved from local Kubernetes runs to repeatable measurement, honest workflow scoring, and operator-facing evidence.
How the local Kubernetes sweep harness turned isolated fast runs into repeatable performance evidence.
Why paid is not the only correct outcome, and why unsupported scenarios must remain visible.
Moving benchmark proof from terminal logs into an operator-facing Mass Adjudication console.
How stronger correctness gates reached a clean 100,000-claim run and exposed the next local scaling bottleneck.
How prior-auth wrong-provider and behavioral-health scenarios moved from unsupported to deliberately scored platform behavior.
Testing Part 9's unconfirmed migration-cost theory at 250,000 claims, finding the real causes through profiling, and confirming a 3.5x throughput gain.
Re-investigating a bug Part 10 disclosed but didn't fix, and finding federal provider-exclusion screening had never been wired into the real adjudication pipeline at all.
Two benchmark fixture bugs, a Submit-chain bottleneck traced to an under-provisioned shared database, and this series' first clean 500,000-claim confirmation.
Closing the wall-clock gap disclosed in Part 10 and Part 12 by proving, with matching host sleep-log evidence, that it was macOS suspending the local Kubernetes cluster mid-run.
Closing the scoring gap carried since Part 9 with a first-ever zero-unsupported run, then finding and fixing why parallelism 56 had quietly underperformed lower concurrency this whole series.
Running this series' first full 1,000,000-claim confirmation, finding a Redis memory ceiling that only that scale could expose, and fixing it live.
Moving the full million-claim corpus onto asynchronous Service Bus adjudication, then proving the separate raw X12 837 onramp at 100,000 claims.